<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America&#8217;s unsustainable industrial agriculture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eatingrealfood.com/articles/americans-unsustainable-industrial-agriculture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eatingrealfood.com/articles/americans-unsustainable-industrial-agriculture/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want to reduce your carbon footprint? Eat less meat - Eating Real Food</title>
		<link>http://www.eatingrealfood.com/articles/americans-unsustainable-industrial-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Want to reduce your carbon footprint? Eat less meat - Eating Real Food</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatingrealfood.com/?p=29#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>[...] years ago, I wrote an manifesto criticizing America&#8217;s industrial agriculture in part on the unsustainable cost of transportation. Chain supermarkets offer discount prices on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years ago, I wrote an manifesto criticizing America&#8217;s industrial agriculture in part on the unsustainable cost of transportation. Chain supermarkets offer discount prices on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.eatingrealfood.com/articles/americans-unsustainable-industrial-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatingrealfood.com/?p=29#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Good summary, but it seems to me that you&#039;re implying industrial agriculture requires the use of fossil fuel inputs for pesticides and fertilizers.  However, I think it is the other way around. The use of pesticides and fertilizers has lead to factory farming as farmers found they required less labor to manage larger areas of land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary, but it seems to me that you&#8217;re implying industrial agriculture requires the use of fossil fuel inputs for pesticides and fertilizers.  However, I think it is the other way around. The use of pesticides and fertilizers has lead to factory farming as farmers found they required less labor to manage larger areas of land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyfox</title>
		<link>http://www.eatingrealfood.com/articles/americans-unsustainable-industrial-agriculture/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eatingrealfood.com/?p=29#comment-110</guid>
		<description>A comment on your analysis: absolutely spot on. A couple of extra items to throw into the mix...the salinization of over 1/5th of the acreage due to irrigation; the loss of topsoil at an increasing rate (it is estimated that Iowa will lose it&#039;s viable topsoil by perhaps 2050); the increase of about 100 million mouths in America (to 400 million) by 2050, with no practical end in sight; the draw down of all major aquifers (including the massive Ogalala); the loss of arable land to development...
Add these to the fossil fuel dilemma and you have a perfect storm for disaster. I don&#039;t see anyone advocating a sane solution (if there is one) yet. Read anything by Wendell Berry on farming about proper farming...yet even he doesn&#039;t address the population issue very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment on your analysis: absolutely spot on. A couple of extra items to throw into the mix&#8230;the salinization of over 1/5th of the acreage due to irrigation; the loss of topsoil at an increasing rate (it is estimated that Iowa will lose it&#8217;s viable topsoil by perhaps 2050); the increase of about 100 million mouths in America (to 400 million) by 2050, with no practical end in sight; the draw down of all major aquifers (including the massive Ogalala); the loss of arable land to development&#8230;<br />
Add these to the fossil fuel dilemma and you have a perfect storm for disaster. I don&#8217;t see anyone advocating a sane solution (if there is one) yet. Read anything by Wendell Berry on farming about proper farming&#8230;yet even he doesn&#8217;t address the population issue very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

